PHP 5.1 or later requires: no simplexml_load_file() Conservative Republicans Have Had Enough Of The Unemployed Cut Them Loose | Pitchfork Uprising

Conservative Republicans Have Had Enough Of The Unemployed Cut Them Loose

Thursday, March 4, 2010
By Mike Hammer (alias the peasant)

Do republicans believe it is time to cut the unemployed loose? It’s beginning to sound that way. Here is some talk from conservative Jamie Allman writing on The Daily Call website: http://dailycaller.com/2010/03/04/bunning-no-hero-for-conservatism/

“There is a lot of talk about fiscal responsibility these days, but so far no one has tackled the truly tough reality that the federal government was never designed to be in the business of helping people eat, work or get along when times are tough.”

My problem with conservatives is hypocrisy. I could respond to the above that the government was never designed to have a space program or a highway system. People democratically decide what they want to do with their tax money.

“Perhaps is the feds weren’t taking a sizeable chunk of our income we would have more money to help our family and neighbors when they are suddenly out of work. Perhaps we would have more money to give to churches and charities that help our fellow citizens in need.”

Again it’s the hypocrisy. What difference does it make if it’s the government or some charitable organization that’s giving the handout? In the end it’s the same thing. Helping the unemployed get through hard times. And since when has the nation’s workforce become charity cases. Are they not the backbone of America? This is my problem with republicans. It’s the contempt they harbor for working class Americans.

“Do I believe I am responsible for helping my fellow citizen in tough times? Yes. I just don’t believe the federal government is responsible for it.”

Problem is that if the government doesn’t do it we can’t depend on this fellow to chip in and help either. If he doesn’t want the government to do it we can be pretty damn certain he doesn’t believe any of his money should be redistributed to the unemployed.

“Unfortunately very few politicians from any party would get elected on a platform of slashing entitlements and few Americans would vote for them since so many of us have grown up believing the government is responsible for our financial well being. “

Whenever you read a republican article on the governments need to be fiscally responsible you will always see this comment thrown in at the end. For republicans it’s not so much about fiscal responsibility as it is about those unemployed bums freeloading off taxes paid by those who are lucky enough to still have a job. Again, if they don’t want the government to get involved with a safety net for those laid off during this great recession you can be as sure as hell they won’t be contributing to any charities to provide that support. Republicans don’t believe you deserve the support at all. Somehow deep in their heart they believe your misfortune is all your fault.

 “The sooner we start making tough choices and electing those who will make tough choices the sooner we will save our children from crushing debt and ballooning centralized government.”

Now lastly here comes the punch line. We need to elect a Republican president with spine enough to make the tough choice to cut the unemployed loose to face their destiny on their own. Republicans won’t stand side by side with their fellow citizens in distress, and they won’t help shoulder their burden during this time of national crisis.

And make no mistake it’s not their children they are worried about. Such heartless conservatives are more likely to eat their own children if they were forced to go without.  Republicans are at the point where they want to throw the dead weight overboard and put the problem behind them.

I, personally, am not so quick to abandon my fellow Americans when times get tough. Although I have to admit that I would think twice before throwing a life preserver to this fellow if he accidently fell overboard. It’s too early in the game to decide who lives and who dies.  It will come to that eventually, but the republicans seem to be ghoulishly eager to get on with it.

Leave a Reply

Additional comments powered by BackType

Email This Post

RSS WorldNet Daily

  • Obama embarrassed by 'Arab Winter' blunder
    (NEW YORK) – The civil war in Syria has highlighted serious pitfalls for the Obama administration, especially at the United Nations in New York. In a rare Saturday meeting, the Obama White House received a double blow as both Moscow and Peking vetoed a U.S., U.K. and French resolution aimed at pressuring Syrian President Bashar al-Assasd […]
  • Syrian activists: 200 dead in government assault
    In a barrage of mortar shells, Syrian forces killed 200 people and wounded hundreds in Homs in an offensive that appears to be the bloodiest episode in the nearly 11-month-old uprising, activists said Saturday. The assault in Homs, which has been one of the main flashpoints of opposition during the uprising, comes as the UN Security […]
  • Israel warns U.S. Jews: Iran could strike here
    Israeli facilities in North America — and around the world — are on high alert, according to an internal security document obtained by ABC News that predicted the threat from Iran against Jewish targets will increase. “We predict that the threat on our sites around the world will increase … on both our guarded sites and […]
  • Israel, U.S. divided over timing of Iran strike
    The U.S. and Israel are publicly disagreeing over timing for a potential attack on Iran’s disputed nuclear facilities, as that nation’s leader said it won’t back down. The U.S. and Israel have a “significant analytic difference” over estimates of how close Iran is to shielding its nuclear program from attack, Aaron David Miller, […]
  • Forget Romney, Obama – voters want Tim Tebow
    He won’t be in this Sunday’s Super Bowl and his Denver Broncos are already 50-to-1 longshots for next year’s National Football League title, but if Tim Tebow swapped the pigskin for politics, he just might be a shoo-in for the White House. Asked which NFL playoff quarterback they would choose for president of the United States […]
  • Romney cruises toward win in Nevada
    Republican front-runner Mitt Romney surged on Friday toward an apparent easy win in Nevada, with a new poll showing him beating rival Newt Gingrich by a 2-to-1 margin on the eve of the state’s presidential nominating contest. Romney is seeking his second consecutive victory on Saturday in the state-by-state Republican race after seizing momentum earlie […]
  • Artist depicts Obama trampling Constitution
    In front of the White House a man is sitting on a park bench in the throes of depression. He is surrounded by 43 presidents. In the forefront, purposefully ignoring the depressed man is President Obama, whose right foot is stepping on the Constitution. James Madison is next to Obama, pleading with him to stop. This […]
  • Gun owners must act to preserve 2nd Amendment
    Every year, voting members of the National Rifle Association (those with 5 or more years of consecutive membership and those with Life or higher-level memberships) are asked to participate in the governance of their organization by voting for a third of their 76-member board of directors. And each year, due to a long and tumultuous […]
  • Farah on Fox with the judge
    WASHINGTON – Joseph Farah, WND’s founder, will appear as a guest on “Freedom Watch” with Judge Andrew Napolitano Monday evening on the Fox Business Channel to talk about his plan to stop another debt limit increase later this year. Farah has re-launched his “No More Red Ink” campaign aimed at freezing borrowing in Washington by […]
  • Jerome Corsi on 'Coast to Coast AM'
    WND senior writer Jerome Corsi will be a guest on the nationally syndicated radio show Monday night to discuss his reporting of an alleged massive money-laundering scheme by global banking giant HSBC. Corsi will join the show in the first hour. “Coast to Coast” airs from 1 a.m. to 5 a.m. Eastern Time. As WND reported, […]